Blog

🐿️ Even the Squirrel Thinks You’ve Gone Too Far

When Elon Musk becomes the voice of reason, it’s time to reassess your conspiracy diet.

The Squirrel Speaks

You know you’re too far out on the anti-vax limb when this squirrel is the one telling you to come back.

Elon Musk—the man who turned Twitter into a free-for-all of conspiracy theories and platformed Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s anti-vax crusade—just did something remarkable: he pushed back on Joe Rogan’s latest vaccine denialism. Not vehemently, not heroically, but enough.

Rolling Stone covered it here → Even Elon Musk Is Trying to Correct Joe Rogan’s Anti-Vax Nonsense

After Rogan hosted Dr. Suzanne Humphries, a fringe figure who claims polio was eradicated by sanitation, not vaccines, Musk tweeted:

“Vaccines… do work well for addressing many diseases. The essence of science is continuously looking at the evidence.”

Let that sink in. When the architect of misinformation’s “free speech” playground starts sounding like a middle-school science teacher, you’ve crossed into epistemic twilight.

The Podcast That Broke the Camel’s Back

Rogan’s Episode #2294 was a masterclass in pseudoscience. Humphries, a nephrologist turned conspiracist, spun tales of polio being caused by pesticides, COVID vaccines containing “snake venom proteins,” and medical institutions fabricating data. Rogan, ever the eager student, declared her book Dissolving Illusions “blew my mind” and vowed to never “look at vaccines the same way again.”

But here’s the kicker: Musk, of all people, stepped in to say, â€œHold up.”

This isn’t about Musk’s credibility (he has none). It’s about the sheer absurdity of the moment. When your misinformation pipeline becomes so clogged with nonsense that even its beneficiaries gag, something’s rotten.

Why I Wrote 30 Pages About a Podcast

A close friend sent me that Rogan episode—#2294 with Dr. Suzanne Humphries—because it clearly struck a chord with him. We don’t usually talk politics, but lately, links like this have started creeping into our conversations. He shared it in good faith, and I knew it meant something to him.

I, admittedly, tend to overanalyze things. So I did what I do: I watched the full 2.5-hour conversation, pausing often to take notes—not to win an argument, but to understand why it felt so persuasive to him.

Here’s what stood out:

  • Historical revisionism: Humphries reframed polio’s decline as a bureaucratic trick, ignoring global vaccine data (e.g., India eliminated polio in 2014 through oral vaccines—despite persistent sanitation challenges).
  • Jargon as camouflage: Terms like “TH1/TH2 skewing” simulate expertise without offering real clarity.
  • Emotional hijacking: Anecdotes of “vaccine-injured” children bypass critical thinking and appeal directly to fear.

The result? A full breakdown of how disinformation works—not just what it gets wrong. (Read it here.)

The Cost of “Do Your Own Research”

The real issue isn’t Rogan or Humphries. It’s the asymmetry of modern discourse. “Do your own research” has become a one-way street:

  • They share a 3-hour podcast.
  • You spend days verifying claims.
  • They dismiss your effort as “overcomplicating it.”

This imbalance isn’t just exhausting—it’s corrosive. Rigor shouldn’t be a solo sport. When only one side plays by rules—peer-reviewed data, citation checks, humility—trust collapses.

The Takeaway

Musk’s half-hearted defense of vaccines isn’t a win. It’s a flare. A signal that the conspiracy ecosystem has grown so bloated, so divorced from reality, that even its architects can’t stomach their own product.

As I wrote in my deep dive:

“Truth-seeking isn’t about winning debates. It’s about proving—to yourself—that rigor matters, even when no one else cares.”

So next time someone says, “Just watch this podcast,” ask:
Whose reality are you funding?

Leave a Reply